Pendampingan Penguatan Kurikulum Madrasah Diniyah dalam Meningkatan Kualitas Generasi Millenial
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53754/civilofficium.v2i1.693Keywords:
curriculum, millennial generation, madrasah diniyah, mentoring, Participatory Action ResearchAbstract
Early education has an important role in forming a quality millennial generation. The quality of early education can be seen from the curriculum implemented. A quality Diniyah curriculum enables the millennial generation to understand religion and its practice in everyday life. This mentoring program was carried out with the aim of describing the existence of the Madrasah Diniyah curriculum. Furthermore, curriculum development was carried out as an effort to prepare a quality millennial generation. The mentoring method uses Participatory Action Research. This method is used in the context of community service research in designing the development of the Madrasah Diniyah curriculum. Curriculum development strengthens aspects of the Arabic language, especially the ability to understand grammar. The media and learning methods used adapt modern methods and maintain classical methods as "genuine" methods in Islamic boarding school communities.
References
Al-Syaibani and A. Tafsir, Ilmu Pendidikan dalam persepektif Islam. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 2005.
S. Suroso, “Manajemen Pembelajaran Pendidikan Diniyyah Formal (PDF) Tingkat Wustho Pondok Pesantren Assalafi Al Fitrah Surabaya,” Adab. J. Pendidik. Islam, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 63, 2018.
A. Muhtadi, Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam, ( Cet : II. Bandung: Alfabeta, 1995.
M. Rosyid, “Pemberdayaan Madrasah Diniyah: Belajar Seabad Madin Mu’awanatul Muslimin Di Kudus.”
A. R. Rosyadi, E. Mujahidin, and A. Muchtar, “Kebijakan Pemerintah Daerah tentang Wajib Belajar Madrasah Diniyah Awaliyah di Kabupaten Pandeglang,” Ta’dibuna J. Pendidik. Islam, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 1, 2013, doi: 10.32832/tadibuna.v2i1.534.
S. Kindon, R. Pain, and M. Kesby, Participatory Action Research, vol. 1–12. Sage publications, 2009. doi: 10.1016/B978-008044910-4.00490-9.
S. Kindon, R. Pain, and M. Kesby, “Participatory action research approaches and methods: Connecting people, participation and place,” Particip. Action Res. Approaches Methods Connect. People, Particip. Place, pp. 1–288, 2007, doi: 10.4324/9780203933671.
R. Chambers, PRA, PLA and Pluralism: Practice and Theory. Sussex: Institute of Development Studies, 2014. doi: 10.4135/9781848607934.n28.
J. Cammarota and M. Fine, “Revolutionizing education: Youth participatory action research in motion,” Revolutionizing Educ. Youth Particip. Action Res. Motion, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 1–248, 2008, doi: 10.4324/9780203932100.
E. Stringer, Introduction to Action Research: Social Research for Social Change [Book Review], vol. 8, no. 1. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication, 2008. doi: 10.3316/qrj0801087.
S. Hidayat, Pengembangan Kurikulum Baru. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 2015.
I. Suhadak, “Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Manusia Dalam Meningkatkan Mutu Pendidikan Madrasah Diniyah,” Perspektive, vol. 10, no. 2.
J. Saepudin, “Integrasi pembelajaran madrasah diniyah takmiliyah ke sekolah (studi kasus di Sekolah Dasar Negeri Cisaat Kabupaten Sukabumi),” J. SMART (Studi Masyarakat, Reli. dan Tradisi), vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 231–246, 2018.
E. Anih, “Manajemen implementasi kebijakan pengembangan kurikulum di perguruan tinggi berbasis kompetensi,” Judika (Jurnal Pendidik. Unsika), 2015, [Online]. Available: http://journal.unsika.ac.id/index.php/judika/article/view/196
A. A. Mubarok, S. Aminah, S. Sukamto, and ..., “Landasan pengembangan kurikulum pendidikan di Indonesia,” J. Dirosah …, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://journal.laaroiba.ac.id/index.php/jdi/article/view/324
Cecep Alba, “Strategi Peningkatan Mutu Pendidikan,” J. Sosioteknologi Ed. 24, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2011.
Kemendikbud, “Pembelajaran Dan Asesmen Kompetensi,” Badan Penelit. dan Pengemb. dan Perbukuan 2021, p. 34, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://drive.google.com/file/d/18f_G5j29r1gF3ujYKVZJ8aMJfsp9ACLM/view
A. J. E. Toenlioe, “Pengem-bangan Kurikulum,” Cetakan Ke-1. Bandung PT Refika Aditama, vol. 09, no. 01, p. 347, 2017, [Online]. Available: file:///E:/documents/Pengembangan Kurikulum _buku.pdf
S. A. Setiawan and N. Puspitasari, “Preferensi Struktur Organisasi Bagi Generasi Millenial,” J. Borneo Adm., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 101–118, 2018, doi: 10.24258/jba.v14i2.336.
L. Troksa, The Study of Generations: A Timeless Notion within a Contemporary Context. Colorado: Department of History at the University of Colorado Boulder, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://scholar.colorado.edu/honr_theses/1169
L. D. M. Rosen, MySpace, and I., Parenting the Net Generation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019.
S. Kemmis, “Participatory Action Research and the Public Sphere,” Educ. action Res., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 459–476, 2006.
F. Kurniawan and D. Putri, “The effectiveness of PAR in educational settings: Case studies from Southeast Asia,” J. Particip. Res. Methods, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 98–112, 2020.
I. Kusumawati et al., PENGEMBANGAN KURIKULUM: Teori dan Praktik, no. April. Yogyakarta: Ar Ruzz Media, 2023.
D. Lazwardi, “Manajemen kurikulum sebagai pengembangan tujuan pendidikan,” Al-Idarah J. Kependidikan Islam, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://ejournal.radenintan.ac.id/index.php/idaroh/article/view/1112
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 A. Rodli Makmun, M. Muhsin, Khambali Khambali

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.