Maslahah Dalam Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Pada Putusan Izin Poligami Nomor 0020/Pdt.G/2017/Pa.Mn

Abstract

Maslahah actions that encourage human goodness or anything beneficial to human beings. This article is in the decision of the Religious Court of Madiun City number 0020/Pdt.G/2017/PA.Mn. The judge only granted the application for permission to have polygamy and rejected the application for separation of joint property; the decision was not granted on the verdict. The method used in this research is a qualitative research method that produces descriptive data analysis. Primary data in the form of the judge's decision of the Religious Court of Madiun City Number 0020/Pdt.G/2017/PA.Mn The secondary source of library materials in the form of books and interviews with judges. The results of this study there are three conclusions, namely 1). That is the decision with case number 0020/Pdt.G/2017/PA.Mn is by the rules of Maslahah Dzaruriyyah because in this matter, to preserve religion, soul, intellect, lineage, and property have been fulfilled. Only one thing has not been fulfilled about the property, so the more significant problem must come first. 2). The maslahah of formal and material written evidence has been met, but in the evidence of common property is not by the law, the judge rejected it, and it is by the maslahah mu'tabaroh supported by syara '. 3). The maslahah in the witness evidence, including the maslahah hajjiyah, is less than maximum, or it is still doubtful that the witness only knows it. Not by the material requirements (Article 171 HIR/308 RBg) to see, hear, and experience for himself. So the judge gave relief to the parties to support the fulfilment of the maintenance of religion, soul, intellect, lineage and property.

References

1. Abror, K. (2016). Poligami Dan Relevansinya Dengan Keharmonisan Rumah Tangga (Studi Di Kelurahan Rajabasa Bandar Lampung). Al-´Adalah.
2. Adonara, F. F. (2015). Prinsip Kebebasan Hakim dalam Memutus Perkara Sebagai Amanat Konstitusi Principles of Fredom of Justice in Decidene The Case as a Constitutional Mandate. Jurnal Konstitusi.
3. Aprianto, N. E. K. (2017). Konsep Harta dalam Tinjauan Maqashid Syariah. Journal of Islamic Economics Lariba.
4. Ardhian, R. F., Anugrah, S., & Setyawan, B. (2015). Poligami Dalam Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Positif Indonesia Serta Urgensi Pemberian Izin Poligam Di Pengadilan Agama. Privat Law.
5. Azhary, M. T. (1982). HUKUM ACARA PERDATA DI LINGKUNGAN PERADILAN AGAMA. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol12.no2.897
6. Azwar, Z. (2016). PEMIKIRAN USHUL FIKIH AL-GHAZÂLÎ TENTANG AL-MASLAHAH AL-MURSALAH (Studi Eksplorasi terhadap Kitab al-Mustashfâ min ‘Ilmi al-Ushûl Karya Al-Ghazâlî). FITRAH:Jurnal Kajian Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman. https://doi.org/10.24952/fitrah.v1i1.327
7. Belakang, A. L. (1974). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor I Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan. Mentri/Sekretaris Negara Republik Indonesia.
8. Direktori Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (2017). Putusan Pengadilan Agama Kota Madiun Nomor 0020/Pdt.G/2017/PA.Mn.
9. Hermanto, A. (2017). ISLAM, POLIGAMI DAN PERLINDUNGAN KAUM PEREMPUAN. KALAM. https://doi.org/10.24042/klm.v9i1.326
10. Muhamad Abu Zahrah. (2010). Usul fiqih (Saefullah ma’sum (ed.); Terjemah). PT Pustaka Firdaus.
11. Sugianto, B. (2017). Kedudukan Ahli Waris Pada Perkawinan Poligami. Al-Adl: Jurnal Hukum.
12. wawancara penanganan perkara, (2019).

License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2021 Izzat Abdika Mukalafin

Indexing & Citations