Implementasi Metode Visual-Auditory-Kinestetik dalam Tari Sigeh Penguten sebagai Tarian Tradisi Lampung

Abstract

The purpose of learning the Sigeh Pengunten Dance with the VAK (Visual) learning method is to determine how students can demonstrate the Sigeh Penguten Dance according to what the teacher teaches. The research method used is descriptive qualitative with a population of UPTD SMPN 3 Metro students and a sample size of 5 students. The results of this study are that the learning process using the visual method, auditory kinesthetic in practice has increased from the first meeting to the eighth meeting. This research can be seen from 3 aspects of VAK, namely visual and auditory in the form of students listening to teacher instructions and paying attention and seeing the teacher demonstrating the Sigeh penguten dance, namely the Lapah tebeng movement, Seluang going home, jong simpuh, sitting down, jong silo Ratu and Sembah, flashback, biting. , samber floated. Guuh Gakhang, Ngiyau Bias, Makuraccang, Kenui floating and tipping at high levels, Sabung Hovering, reject slashing and splitting hui, able to bias, end to a moderate level and end to a low level, Lipetto and Jong Simpuh Sembah. Regarding the kinesthetic aspect of students dancing, the Sigeh Penguten dance With the various movements mentioned above, starting from the first meeting to the seventh meeting, the eight students took practical tests to take scores and evaluations. The value obtained from the practical test carried out increased understanding, which could be seen in the increase in the value obtained, although it decreased slightly at the third meeting. The results of the VAk learning test (Visual, auditory., Kinesthetic) as a whole show the data that students have been able to demonstrate the Sigeh Penguten dance with an average score of Good.

References

1. Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2010. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
2. Bungin, Burhan. 2007. Penelitian Kualitatif Edisi Kedua. Jakarta: Kencana.
3. Deporter, B. 2010. Quantum Teaching. Bandung: KAIFA
4. Fadlillah, M. 2014. Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 Dalam Pembelajaran SD/MI, SMP/MTs, dan SMA. Yogyakarta: PT. ArRuzz Media.
5. Fathoni, Abdurrahman. 2011. Metodologi penelitian dan teknik Penyusunan Skripsi. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
6. Gunawan, Adi W. 2003. Genius Learning Strategi: Petunjuk Praktis untuk menerapkan Accelarated Learning, Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
7. Gunawan, Adi. 2003. Genius Learning Strategi: Petunjuk Praktis Untuk Menerapkan Accelerated Learning. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
8. Hamzah, Mohammad. 2013. Belajar dengan Pendekatan PAIKEM. Jakarta: remaja Rosdakarya.
9. Ikbar, Yanuar. 2012. Metode Penelitian Sosial Kualitatif. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
10. Mulyono. 2012.Strategi Pembelajaran. Malang: UIN Maliki Press.
11. Mustika, I Wayan. 2012. Teknik Dasar Gerak Tari Lampung. Bandar Lampung: AURA
12. Notoadmojo, Soekdjo. 2003. Pengembangan Sumber daya Manusia. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
13. S. Suparman. 2010. Gaya Mengajar Yang Menyenangkan Siswa. Jogjakarta: Pinus Book Publisher
14. Subagyo, Joko. 2004. Metode Penelitian dalam Teori dan Praktek. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.
15. Uundang-undang Republik Indonesia I No. 2 Tahun 1989.
16. Wanger, win. 2004. Teaching & Learning. Bandung: Nuansa
17. Yunita, Dewi. 2015. “Pembelajaran Tari SigehPenguten Menggunakan Metode Latihan Pada Kegiatan Ekstrakurikuler di SMPN 21 Bandar Lampung”, Jurnal Penelitian: Universitas Lampung

License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2021 Apriyani

Indexing & Citations