Articles

Pembinaan dan Pengawasan Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Daerah Otonomi Khusus di Papua

Barik Muhammad Kurniawan Ardy1
1 Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri Jakarta
Published
06-09-2021
Pages
124-139

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the performance of the Directorate of Regional Arrangement, Special Autonomy, and the Regional Autonomy Advisory Council in fostering and supervising the implementation of special autonomy in Papua, analyzing the supporting factors and obstacles to the performance of the guidance and supervision carried out by the directorate as well as analyzing the strategy of guidance and supervision in the administration of local government. Special autonomy in Papua. Descriptive qualitative research design through an inductive approach. Data obtained from observation, documentation, and interviews with key informants were then analyzed using triangulation to analyze supporting and inhibiting factors and strategies, used SWOT Matrix and Litmus Test. Based on the results of data analysis, it is concluded that; (1) the directorate's performance in fostering and supervising the administration of the particular autonomous regional government in Papua has not been optimal; (2) performance supporting factors. Namely, organizational legality, human resources, leadership commitment, inter-institutional linkages, national priorities and access to coordination communication as well as performance inhibiting factors, namely, limiting regulations, limited funding, differences in employee orientation, national disintegration, 'span' of control which is far away, and the commitment between stakeholders is not optimal and; (3) the strategy resulting from this research is the "K5" strategy, namely strengthening in terms of Institutional, Communication, Coordination, HR Quality, and IT Quality. From this conclusion, the researcher provides suggestions, namely restructuring the directorate, preparing guidance and supervision instruments in the implementation of Papua's special autonomy, expanding cooperation networks or partnerships with stakeholders, developing digital-based information systems, facilitating employees to attend training or workshops, and a commitment to realizing the "K5" strategy.

Keywords: Local government Papua Special Autonomy Supervision

References

  1. Abdullah, R. (2005). Pelaksanaan otonomi luas dengan pemilihan Kepala Daerah secara langsung. RajaGrafindo Persada.
  2. Akbar, K., Pasha Karim, Z., Fadlullah, N., & Siddiq Armia, M. (2021). Sistem Pengawasan Dana Otonomi Khsusus Aceh dan Dampaknya terhadap Pemberantasan Korupsi. INTEGRITAS, 7(1), 101–120. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v7i1.719
  3. Badan Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara. (2020). Penelaahan Atas Dana Otonomi Khusus Provinsi Papua Barat. https://www.dpr.go.id/dokakd/dokumen/BAKN-55-7dcb2d5a7b778132d6877049d05a2db1.pdf
  4. Baswir, R. (2000). Koperasi Indonesia. BPFE.
  5. Dwiyanto, A. (2017). Mewujudkan Good Governance Melalui Pelayanan Publik. Gajah Mada University Press. https://www.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=fV0XEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&ots=jO2qEzwjaH&sig=7q-FSPd4oVcNLBrLH8L0GDJEaZo
  6. Fachruddin. (2016). Membangun otonomi Daerah Memperkuat NKRI : Catatan Seorang Anggota DPR RI (2004-2009). Serat Alam Media (SAM). http://inlis-dispersip.probolinggokab.go.id/inlislite3/opac/browse?action=browse&tag=PublishLocation&findBy=Alphabetical&query=T&query2=Tangerang Selatan :
  7. Iha, C. (2018). Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Otonomi Khusus di Distrik Kayuni Kabupaten Fak-Fak Propinsi Papua Barat. Jurnal Politicio, 7(1). https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/politico/article/view/16324
  8. MILES, M. B., & HUBERMAN, A. M. (1984). Drawing Valid Meaning from Qualitative Data: Toward a Shared Craft. Educational Researcher, 13(5), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X013005020
  9. Undang-undang (UU) Nomor 2 Tahun 2021 Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2001 tentang Otonomi Khusus bagi Provinsi Papua, Pub. L. No. 155 (2021). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/172403/uu-no-2-tahun-2021
  10. Rangkuti, F. (2015). Personal swot analysis : peluang di balik setiap kesulitan. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  11. Silverman, R. M., & Patterson, K. (2014). Qualitative Research Methods for Community Development. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315797762

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2021 Barik Muhammad Kurniawan Ardy

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Indexing & Citations

How to Cite

Kurniawan Ardy, B. M. . (2021). Pembinaan dan Pengawasan Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Daerah Otonomi Khusus di Papua . Ascarya: Journal of Islamic Science, Culture, and Social Studies, 1(2), 124-139. https://doi.org/10.53754/iscs.v1i2.24

Similar Articles

1-10 of 27

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.