Pembinaan dan Pengawasan Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Daerah Otonomi Khusus di Papua


  • Barik Muhammad Kurniawan Ardy Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri Jakarta



Local government, Papua Special Autonomy, Supervision


This study aims to analyze the performance of the Directorate of Regional Arrangement, Special Autonomy, and the Regional Autonomy Advisory Council in fostering and supervising the implementation of special autonomy in Papua, analyzing the supporting factors and obstacles to the performance of the guidance and supervision carried out by the directorate as well as analyzing the strategy of guidance and supervision in the administration of local government. Special autonomy in Papua. Descriptive qualitative research design through an inductive approach. Data obtained from observation, documentation, and interviews with key informants were then analyzed using triangulation to analyze supporting and inhibiting factors and strategies, used SWOT Matrix and Litmus Test. Based on the results of data analysis, it is concluded that; (1) the directorate's performance in fostering and supervising the administration of the particular autonomous regional government in Papua has not been optimal; (2) performance supporting factors. Namely, organizational legality, human resources, leadership commitment, inter-institutional linkages, national priorities and access to coordination communication as well as performance inhibiting factors, namely, limiting regulations, limited funding, differences in employee orientation, national disintegration, 'span' of control which is far away, and the commitment between stakeholders is not optimal and; (3) the strategy resulting from this research is the "K5" strategy, namely strengthening in terms of Institutional, Communication, Coordination, HR Quality, and IT Quality. From this conclusion, the researcher provides suggestions, namely restructuring the directorate, preparing guidance and supervision instruments in the implementation of Papua's special autonomy, expanding cooperation networks or partnerships with stakeholders, developing digital-based information systems, facilitating employees to attend training or workshops, and a commitment to realizing the "K5" strategy.


Download data is not yet available.


Abdullah, R. (2005). Pelaksanaan otonomi luas dengan pemilihan Kepala Daerah secara langsung. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Akbar, K., Pasha Karim, Z., Fadlullah, N., & Siddiq Armia, M. (2021). Sistem Pengawasan Dana Otonomi Khsusus Aceh dan Dampaknya terhadap Pemberantasan Korupsi. INTEGRITAS, 7(1), 101–120.

Badan Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara. (2020). Penelaahan Atas Dana Otonomi Khusus Provinsi Papua Barat.

Baswir, R. (2000). Koperasi Indonesia. BPFE.

Dwiyanto, A. (2017). Mewujudkan Good Governance Melalui Pelayanan Publik. Gajah Mada University Press.

Fachruddin. (2016). Membangun otonomi Daerah Memperkuat NKRI : Catatan Seorang Anggota DPR RI (2004-2009). Serat Alam Media (SAM). Selatan :

Iha, C. (2018). Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Otonomi Khusus di Distrik Kayuni Kabupaten Fak-Fak Propinsi Papua Barat. Jurnal Politicio, 7(1).

MILES, M. B., & HUBERMAN, A. M. (1984). Drawing Valid Meaning from Qualitative Data: Toward a Shared Craft. Educational Researcher, 13(5), 20–30.

Undang-undang (UU) Nomor 2 Tahun 2021 Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2001 tentang Otonomi Khusus bagi Provinsi Papua, Pub. L. No. 155 (2021).

Rangkuti, F. (2015). Personal swot analysis : peluang di balik setiap kesulitan. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Silverman, R. M., & Patterson, K. (2014). Qualitative Research Methods for Community Development. Routledge.



How to Cite

Kurniawan Ardy, B. M. . (2021). Pembinaan dan Pengawasan Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Daerah Otonomi Khusus di Papua . Ascarya: Journal of Islamic Science, Culture, and Social Studies, 1(2), 124–139.