Exploring Community Perspectives on Household Waste Management in Dili
Insights from Lahane Oriental
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53754/iscs.v4i2.706Keywords:
Household Waste Management, Community Knowledge, Community AttitudesAbstract
This study explores the relationship between the knowledge, attitudes, and behavior of the community in managing household waste in the Urban Village of Lahane Oriental, Dili. This study was motivated by the growing global and local challenges of waste management, particularly in urban areas where population growth exacerbates this issue. This research employed an analytical observational design with a cross-sectional approach, using questionnaires distributed to 96 respondents selected through simple random sampling. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Pearson’s correlation to assess the relationship between knowledge, attitudes, and behavior. The results showed that the majority of respondents (61.5%) had sufficient knowledge of waste management, while 62.5% demonstrated a positive attitude toward proper waste management. However, the community's waste management behavior did not fully meet the expected standards, despite generally positive attitudes and moderate knowledge. These findings indicate that, although knowledge and attitudes play an important role in influencing behavior, the lack of adequate infrastructure and institutional support remains a major obstacle to optimal waste management practices. It was concluded that further educational campaigns and improvements in waste management facilities are crucial for enhancing community engagement in sustainable waste management. The findings provide practical implications for local governments and policymakers in designing effective waste management interventions that consider both behavioral and structural factors.Downloads
References
Abubakar, I. R., Maniruzzaman, K. M., Dano, U. L., AlShihri, F. S., AlShammari, M. S., Ahmed, S. M. S., Al-Gehlani, W. A. G., & Alrawaf, T. I. (2022). Environmental Sustainability Impacts of Solid Waste Management Practices in the Global South. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(19), Article 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912717
Afroz, R., Hanaki, K., & Hasegawa-Kurisu, K. (2009). Willingness to pay for waste management improvement in Dhaka city, Bangladesh. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(1), 492–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.12.012
Ajzen, I. (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(4), 314–324.
Al-Khatib, I. A., Kontogianni, S., Abu Nabaa, H., Alshami, N., & Al-Sari’, M. I. (2015). Public perception of hazardousness caused by current trends of municipal solid waste management. Waste Management, 36, 323–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.10.026
Ando, A. W., & Gosselin, A. Y. (2005). RECYCLING IN MULTIFAMILY DWELLINGS: DOES CONVENIENCE MATTER? Economic Inquiry, 43(2), 426–438. https://doi.org/10.1093/ei/cbi029
Azen, R., & Walker, C. M. (2021). Categorical Data Analysis for the Behavioral and Social Sciences (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429330308
Bakhtiar, B., Ginting, D., & M Silitonga, E. (2022). Perilaku Masyarakat Terhadap Pengelolaan Sampah Rumah Tangga di Desa Meunasah Alue Ie Puteh Kabupaten Aceh Utara. Al-Tamimi Kesmas: Jurnal Ilmu Kesehatan Masyarakat (Journal of Public Health Sciences), 11(2), 87–93. https://doi.org/10.35328/kesmas.v11i2.2244
Barr, S., Ford, N. J., & Gilg, A. W. (2003). Attitudes towards Recycling Household Waste in Exeter, Devon: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Local Environment, 8(4), 407–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549830306667
Barr, S., Gilg, A. W., & Ford, N. (2005). The household energy gap: Examining the divide between habitual- and purchase-related conservation behaviours. Energy Policy, 33(11), 1425–1444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2003.12.016
Brace, I. (2018). Questionnaire design: How to plan, structure and write survey material for effective market research. Kogan Page Publishers.
Budihardjo, M. A., Ardiansyah, S. Y., & Ramadan, B. S. (2022). Community-driven material recovery facility (CdMRF) for sustainable economic incentives of waste management: Evidence from Semarang City, Indonesia. Habitat International, 119, 102488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2021.102488
Challcharoenwattana, A., & Pharino, C. (2018). Analysis of Socioeconomic and Behavioral Factors Influencing Participation in Community-Based Recycling Program: A Case of Peri-Urban Town in Thailand. Sustainability, 10(12), 4500. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124500
Cheah, C. G., Chia, W. Y., Lai, S. F., Chew, K. W., Chia, S. R., & Show, P. L. (2022). Innovation designs of industry 4.0 based solid waste management: Machinery and digital circular economy. Environmental Research, 213, 113619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.113619
Christmann, A., & Van Aelst, S. (2006). Robust estimation of Cronbach’s alpha. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 97(7), 1660–1674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmva.2005.05.012
Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (2003). A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct: Recycling the Concept of Norms to Reduce Littering in Public Places. Readings About The Social Animal, 56.
Desa, A., Kadir, N. B. A., & Yusooff, F. (2012). Waste Education and Awareness Strategy: Towards Solid Waste Management (SWM) Program at UKM. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 47–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.244
Dewulf, A., Klenk, N., Wyborn, C., & Lemos, M. C. (2020). Usable environmental knowledge from the perspective of decision-making: The logics of consequentiality, appropriateness, and meaningfulness. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 42, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.10.003
Diekmann, A., & Preisendörfer, P. (1998). Enviromental Behavior: Discrepancies Between Aspirations and Reality. Rationality and Society, 10(1), 79–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/104346398010001004
Ertiö, T.-P. (2015). Participatory Apps for Urban Planning—Space for Improvement. Planning Practice & Research, 30(3), 303–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2015.1052942
Farrow, K., Grolleau, G., & Ibanez, L. (2017). Social Norms and Pro-environmental Behavior: A Review of the Evidence. Ecological Economics, 140, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.04.017
Ferronato, N., & Torretta, V. (2019). Waste Mismanagement in Developing Countries: A Review of Global Issues. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(6), 1060. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16061060
Gable, G. G. (1994). Integrating case study and survey research methods: An example in information systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 3(2), 112–126. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.1994.12
Gifford, R., & Nilsson, A. (2014). Personal and social factors that influence pro‐environmental concern and behaviour: A review. International Journal of Psychology, 49(3), 141–157.
Guerrero, L. A., Maas, G., & Hogland, W. (2013). Solid waste management challenges for cities in developing countries. Waste Management, 33(1), 220–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2012.09.008
Hines, J. M., Hungerford, H. R., & Tomera, A. N. (1987). Analysis and Synthesis of Research on Responsible Environmental Behavior: A Meta-Analysis. The Journal of Environmental Education, 18(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1987.9943482
Hopper, J. R., & Nielsen, J. M. (1991). Recycling as Altruistic Behavior: Normative and Behavioral Strategies to Expand Participation in a Community Recycling Program. Environment and Behavior, 23(2), 195–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916591232004
Hurst, M., Dittmar, H., Bond, R., & Kasser, T. (2013). The relationship between materialistic values and environmental attitudes and behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 36, 257–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.09.003
IntechOpen. (2021). IntechOpen—Open Science Open Minds | IntechOpen. https://www.intechopen.com/
Kaiser, F. G., Wölfing, S., & Fuhrer, U. (1999). ENVIRONMENTAL ATTITUDE AND ECOLOGICAL BEHAVIOUR. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1998.0107
Kamaruddin, S. M., Pawson, E., & Kingham, S. (2013). Facilitating Social Learning in Sustainable Waste Management: Case Study of NGOs Involvement in Selangor, Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 105, 325–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.034
Kinnaman, T. C., & Fullerton, D. (2002). The Economics of Residential Solid Waste Management. In D. Fullerton & T. Kinnaman (Eds.), The Economics of Household Garbage and Recycling Behavior (pp. 1–48). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035304622.00006
Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401
Krejcie, R. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational Psychol Meas.
Lapinski, M. K., & Rimal, R. N. (2005). An Explication of Social Norms. Communication Theory, 15(2), 127–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2005.tb00329.x
Latif, S. A., Omar, M. S., Bidin, Y. H., & Awang, Z. (2013). Role of Environmental Knowledge in Creating Pro-Environmental Residents. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 105, 866–874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.088
Madden, T. J., Ellen, P. S., & Ajzen, I. (1992). A Comparison of the Theory of Planned Behavior and the Theory of Reasoned Action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167292181001
Maghfiroh, S. A., Hardati, P., & Arifien, M. (2018). Pengaruh Penyuluhan Tentang Sampah Terhadap Pengetahuan, Sikap dan Perilaku Ibu Rumah Tangga (Anggota PKK) Dalam Mengelola Sampah Rumah Tangga Pada Permukiman Tradisional dan Permukiman Modern di Kelurahan Pudak Payung. Edu Geography, 6(2), Article 2.
Maiurova, A., Kurniawan, T. A., Kustikova, M., Bykovskaia, E., Othman, M. H. D., Singh, D., & Goh, H. H. (2022). Promoting digital transformation in waste collection service and waste recycling in Moscow (Russia): Applying a circular economy paradigm to mitigate climate change impacts on the environment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 354, 131604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131604
McKenzie-Mohr, D. (2000). Fostering sustainable behavior through community-based social marketing. American Psychologist, 55(5), 531.
Medina, M. (2010). Solid wastes, poverty and the environment in developing country cities: Challenges and opportunities (Issue 2010/23). WIDER Working Paper.
Nižetić, S., Djilali, N., Papadopoulos, A., & Rodrigues, J. J. P. C. (2019). Smart technologies for promotion of energy efficiency, utilization of sustainable resources and waste management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 231, 565–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.397
Raco, M. (2000). Assessing community participation in local economic development—Lessons for the new urban policy. Political Geography, 19(5), 573–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-6298(00)00004-4
Rahman, R., Sididi, M., & Yusriani, Y. (2020). Pengaruh Pengetahuan dan Sikap Terhadap Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Pengelolaan Sampah di Kampung Nelayan Untia. Jurnal Surya Muda, 2(2), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.38102/jsm.v2i2.70
Schultz, P. W., Nolan, J. M., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J., & Griskevicius, V. (2007). The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms. Psychological Science, 18(5), 429–434. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01917.x
Schwartz, S. H. (1977). Normative Influences on Altruism. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 221–279). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60358-5
Shan, X., Ang, W. L., & Yang, E.-H. (2020). Mobile app-aided risks, attitudes, norms, abilities and self-regulation (RANAS) approach for recycling behavioral change in Singapore. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 162, 105049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105049
Srisantyorini, T., & Kusumaningtias, F. (2018). Pengetahuan, Sikap dan Perilaku Ibu Rumah Tangga Terhadap Pengelolaan Sampah di Wilayah Sekitar Rel Kereta Api, Kelurahan Jombang, Kecamatan Ciputat, Kota Tangerang Selatan. Jurnal Kedokteran Dan Kesehatan, 14(2), 65. https://doi.org/10.24853/jkk.14.2.65-73
Strydom, W. F. (2018). Barriers to Household Waste Recycling: Empirical Evidence from South Africa. Recycling, 3(3), 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling3030041
Ulhasanah, N., & Goto, N. (2018). Assessment of citizens’ environmental behavior toward municipal solid waste management for a better and appropriate system in Indonesia: A case study of Padang City. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 20(2), 1257–1272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-017-0691-4
Vicente, P., & Reis, E. (2008). Factors influencing households’ participation in recycling. Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy, 26(2), 140–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X07077371
Vining, J., & Ebreo, A. (1992). Predicting Recycling Behavior from Global and Specific Environmental Attitudes and Changes in Recycling Opportunities 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(20), 1580–1607. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb01758.x
Wang, X., & Cheng, Z. (2020). Cross-Sectional Studies. Chest, 158(1), S65–S71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.012
Wilson, D. C., Velis, C., & Cheeseman, C. (2006). Role of informal sector recycling in waste management in developing countries. Habitat International, 30(4), 797–808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2005.09.005
World Bank Group. (2019). World Bank Group—International Development, Poverty, & Sustainability [Text/HTML]. World Bank. https://www.worldbank.org/en/home
Zhang, D. (2019). Application of Blockchain Technology in Incentivizing Efficient Use of Rural Wastes: A case study on Yitong System. Energy Procedia, 158, 6707–6714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2019.01.018
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Flora Martignonia De Carvalho Ximenes, Anderias Umbu Roga, Pius Weraman

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).