Journal of Islamic Science, Culture & Social Studies
Islamic Science

State-Sponsored Qur’anic Exegesis and Interreligious Relations

A Comparative Study of Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and Indonesia

Aksin Wijaya1 Ahmad Zainal Abidin2 Muh Syaifudin3
1 Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Ageng Muhammad Besari Ponorogo
2 UIN Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah Tulungagung
3 Universitas Wahid Hasyim
Corresponding author: aksin@iainponorogo.ac.id
https://doi.org/10.53754/iscs.v5i2.854
Download article
PDF
Published
29-12-2025
Issue
Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025)
Pages
280–292

Abstract

This article explores how three state-sponsored Qurʾānic exegeses-al-Muntakhab (Egypt), al-Muyassar (Saudi Arabia), and al-Wajiz (Indonesia)-conceptualize the essence of religion and articulate models of interreligious relations. These tafsirs are selected because they are produced by official state institutions and therefore reflect the ideological orientations and religious policies of their respective governments. Employing a qualitative comparative method, this study combines theoretical hermeneutics to reconstruct the historical meanings of the tafsirs with philosophical hermeneutics to assess their relevance for contemporary Indonesian society. The analysis focuses on three dimensions: methodological identity, the conception of religion in terms of unity and diversity, and approaches to interreligious relations encompassing dialogue, social harmony, and cooperation. The findings demonstrate that although the three tafsirs share fundamental theological premises-such as monotheism, prophetic continuity, and moral universality-they differ significantly in interpretive orientation. Al-Muntakhab reflects a rational-moderate Azhari tradition, al-Muyassar adopts a scripturalist Salafi framework with exclusivist tendencies, while al-Wajiz advances an inclusive and accommodative hermeneutic aligned with Indonesia’s pluralistic ethos and the principle of Bhinneka Tunggal Ika. This study argues that state-sponsored tafsir functions not merely as a religious text but as an ideological instrument that shapes public religious discourse. When oriented toward justice, equality, and interreligious cooperation, such tafsir can contribute meaningfully to religious moderation in plural societies.

Keywords: Indonesia interreligious relations Qurʾānic exegesis Saudi Arabia state-sponsored tafsir

References

  1. Ardi, R., Tobing, D. H., Agustina, G. N., Iswahyudi, A. F., & Budiarti, D. (2021). Religious Schema and Tolerance Towards Alienated Groups in Indonesia. Heliyon, 7(7), e07603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07603
  2. Balqis, U. L. (2025). The Production of Scientific Interpretation Discourse in State Institutions: A Study of Tamsil Language in QS Al-’Ankabūt Verse 41. Al-Bayan Jurnal Studi Ilmu Al- Qur an Dan Tafsir, 10(1), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.15575/al-bayan.v10i1.45790
  3. Bleicher, J. (2017). Contemporary Hermeneutics: Hermeneutics as Method, Philosophy and Critique. Taylor & Francis.
  4. Bruckmayr, P. (2024). Challenging the Cairo Edition: The King Fahd Quran Complex, its Medina Quran and its Translations. MIDÉO: Mélanges de l’Institut Dominicain d’études Orientales, 39, 211–257. https://journals.openedition.org/mideo/9400?lang=en
  5. Cholily, N. (2023). MODERATION IN INDONESIAN TAFSIR: CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF THE TERMS OF UMMATAN WASATAN IN THE AL-QUR’AN DAN TERJEMAHANNYA BY THE MINISTRY OF RELIGION OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA. Mushaf: Jurnal Tafsir Berwawasan Keindonesiaan, 3(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.33650/mushaf.v3i2.6171
  6. Dinata, M. R. (2012). KONSEP TOLERANSI BERAGAMA DALAM TAFSIR AL-QUR’AN TEMATIK KARYA TIM DEPARTEMEN AGAMA REPUBLIK INDONESIA [Skripsi, UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta]. https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/55100/
  7. Farhan, A., & Subagio, S. (2024). Wasathiyah in the Tafsir of the Ministry of Religious Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia: A Study of Theory and Implementation. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(1), 937–956. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v14-i1/20122
  8. Hadi, F. (2024). Inklusifisme dalam Tafsir Tematik Moderasi Beragama Kementerian Agama RI. El-Umdah: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Al-Qur’an Tafsir, 7(2), 142–196. https://doi.org/10.20414/elumdah.v7i2.9281
  9. Hidayatullah, S., Abidin, Z., & Masuwd, M. (2024). The Concept of “Kafir” in the Qur’an Revisited: Comparative Insights from Marah Labid and the Ministry of Religious Affairs’ Exegesis. Al-Karim: International Journal of Quranic and Islamic Studies, 2(2), 138–164. https://doi.org/10.33367/al-karim.v2i2.6035
  10. Hutabarat, F. (2023). Navigating Diversity: Exploring Religious Pluralism and Social Harmony in Indonesian Society. European Journal of Theology and Philosophy, 3(6), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.24018/theology.2023.3.6.125
  11. Ibn Kathīr, I. ibn ʻUmar. (1998). Tafsīr ibn Kathīr. Dār al-Kutub al-’Ilmiyah.
  12. Ismail, F. (2012). Republik bhinneka tunggal ika: Mengurai isu-isu konflik, multikulturalisme, agama dan sosial budaya. Kementerian Agama RI, Badan Litbang dan Diklat, Puslitbang Kehidupan Keagamaan.
  13. Ismail, F. (2014). Dinamika kerukunan antarumat beragama: Konflik, rekonsiliasi, dan harmoni. In TA - TT - (Cetakan pe). PT Remaja Rosdakarya. https://doi.org/%2520LK%2520%2520-%2520https://worldcat.org/title/902848122
  14. Ismail, N. B. (2017). The Quranic Exegesis, Reformism, and Women in Twentieth Century Indonesia. Studia Islamika, 24(3), 469–501. https://doi.org/10.15408/sdi.v24i3.5187
  15. Izzan, A. (2013). INKLUSIFISME TAFSIR: STUDI RELASI MUSLIM DAN NON-MUSLIM DALAM TAFSIR AL-MIZAN. Sekolah Pascasarjana UIN Jakarta.
  16. Jansen, J. J. G. (1980). The Interpretation of the Koran in Modern Egypt. E.J. Brill.
  17. Kemenag. (2016). Tafsir Ringkas Kemenag (Jilid I). Lajnah Pentashihan Mushaf Al-Qur’an.
  18. Kulieva, E. (2022, June 10). Qur’an translation of the week #108: Al-Muntakhab in Russian- Egyptian daʿwa in the post-Soviet space. GloQur – The Global Qur’an (Blog). https://gloqur.de/quran-translation-of-the-week-108-al-muntakhab-in-russian-egyptian-da%CA%BFwa-in-the-post-soviet-space/
  19. Kusuma, J. H., & Susilo, S. H. (2020). Intercultural and Religious Sensitivity Among Young Indonesian Interfaith Groups. Religions, 11(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11010026
  20. Lukman, F. (2024). Conflicting Interests in the Creation of a State-Authorised Translation: Comparing the Saudi and Indonesian Editions of Al-Qur’an Dan Terjemahnya. Journal of Qur’anic Studies, 26(1), 38–62. https://doi.org/10.3366/jqs.2024.0568
  21. Majlis al-Aʿlā li al-Shuʾūn al-Islāmiyyah. (2006). Al-Muntakhab fī Tafsīr al-Qurʾān al-Karīm. Majlis al-Aʿlā li al-Shuʾūn al-Islāmiyyah.
  22. Mujahidin, A. (2021). The Implication of Local Wisdom in Tafsir Al-Azhar on Moderate Islamic Thought by Hamka. El Harakah Jurnal Budaya Islam, 23(2), 239–255. https://doi.org/10.18860/eh.v23i2.13414
  23. Mursyid, A. Y., AlBaihaqi, M. D., & Murtafi’ah, A. R. (2024). Politics and Pluralism: Analyzing State Official Tafsir and Interfaith Discourse in Indonesia. Jurnal Studi Ilmu-Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Hadis, 25(1), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.v25i1.5379
  24. Mursyid, M. (2021). Kebijakan Politik Tafsir Negara Atas Ayat-Ayat Fiqh: Studi Analisis Tafsir Departemen Agama Dalam Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsirnya. Al-Bayan: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir, 6(2), 217–233. https://doi.org/10.15575/al-bayan.v6i2.13601
  25. Nando, M. (2023). Ayat-Ayat Toleransi (Analisis Komparatif Penafsiran Imam Asy-Syaukani Dalam Tafsir Fathul Qadir Dan Tafsir Kementerian Agama RI). Al-Karim: Jurnal Pendidikan, Psikologi, Dan Studi Islam, 9(2), 113–128. https://doi.org/10.55927/al-karim.v9i2.7497
  26. Nasution, K. A., Zakaria, Z. A., & Jufri Naldo. (2025). Interpretation of Tolerance Verses in the Ministry of Religion’s Thematic Interpretation of Inter-Religious Relations. Al-Fahmu: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir, 4(2), 271–286. https://doi.org/10.58363/alfahmu.v4i2.509
  27. Nukhbatu min al-‘Ulamā.’ (1433). At-Tafsīr al-Muyassar. Majma‘ al-Malik Fahd li-Ṭibā‘at al-Muṣḥaf al-Sharīf.
  28. Nurdjana, I. G. M. (2009). Hukum dan aliran kepercayaan menyimpang di Indonesia: Peran polisi, Bakorpakem & pola penanggulangan. In TA - TT -. Pustaka Pelajar.
  29. Nurrohim, A., Setiawan, A. H., & Sweta, A. A. (2024). The Concept of Islamic Moderation in Indonesia: A Comparative Study in Tafsir An-Nur and Al-Qur’an and its Translation by Indonesian Ministry of Religious Affairs. International Journal of Religion, 5(10), 2110–2125. https://doi.org/10.61707/5b1e9h02
  30. Nurrohim, A., Setiawan, A. H., Sweta, A. A., & Muthoifn. (2024). The Concept of Islamic Moderation in Indonesia: A Comparative Study in Tafsir an-Nur and Tafsir of the Ministry of Religious Affairs (MORA). International Journal of Religion, 5(10), 2110–2125. https://doi.org/10.61707/5b1e9h02
  31. Pink, J. (2010). Tradition and Ideology in Contemporary Sunnite Qur’ānic Exegesis: Qur’ānic Commentaries from the Arab World, Turkey and Indonesia and their Interpretation of Q 5:51. Die Welt Des Islams, 50(1), 3–59. https://doi.org/10.1163/157006010X489801
  32. Piscatori, J., & Saikal, A. (2019). Saudi “Guardianship” of the Umma. In Islam Beyond Borders: The Umma in World Politics (pp. 85–133). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108666589.005
  33. Rosi, F. F., Maram, A. N., Wara, J., & Qomariya, N. (2025). Politics and Ideology in Qur’anic Translation: A Comparative Analysis Between the Indonesian Ministry of Religious Affairs Translation and the Hilali-Khan Translation. Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Mu’ashirah: Media Kajian Al-Qur’an Dan Al-Hadits Multi Perspektif, 22(1), 93–113. https://doi.org/10.22373/jim.v22i1.29862
  34. Samsudin, S. (2006). Integrasi Hermeneutika Hans George Gadamer ke dalam Ilmu Tafsir? Sebuah Proyek Pengembangan Metode Pembacaan al-Qur’an pada Masa Kontemporer. Annual Conference Kajian Islam.
  35. Setiawan, M. N. K. (2008). Akar-akar pemikiran progresif dalam kajian al-qur’an. eLSAQ Press.
  36. Shihab, M. Q. (2007). Logika Agama. Lentera Hati.
  37. Ṭabari (al), M. ibn J. (2000). Jāmi’ al-Bayān fī Ta’wīl Āy al-Qur’ān. Muassasah al-Risalah.
  38. Taufik, A., Anwar, H., Kusmana, K., Zakaria, W. F. A. W., & Kailani, M. (2025). Countering Radicalism Through Tafsir: State and Jihad in Indonesia’s Thematic Quranic Interpretation. Ulul Albab: Jurnal Studi Islam, 26(1), 143–163. https://doi.org/10.18860/ua.v26i1.32141
  39. Thoha, A. (2010). Ḥiwār al-Adyān bayna bināʾ jusūr al-tafāhum wa ḥifẓ al-huwīyah. Al-Tajdīd, XIV(27), 133–163.
  40. Wijaya, A., Abidin, A. Z., Syaifudin, Muh., & Awwari, A. F. (2022). TAFSIR AL-QUR’AN MAZHAB NEGARA (Pandangan Tafsir al-Muntakhab, al-Muyassar dan al-Wajiz, tentang Hubungan Antaragama menurut Al-Qur’an).
  41. Yakubovych, M. (2024). The Kingdom and the Qur’an: Translating the Holy Book of Islam in Saudi Arabia. Open Book Publishers. https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0381
  42. Zacharias, S., Sugiyarto, K. H., Daliman, M., & Sukarna, T. (2023). Religious Scriptures in Indonesia Focusing on Semantic Studies Towards Unity. Pharos Journal of Theology, 105(1). https://doi.org/10.46222/pharosjot.10529

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 Aksin Wijaya, Ahmad Zainal Abidin, Muh Syaifudin

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Indexing & Citations

How to Cite

Wijaya, A., Abidin, A. Z., & Syaifudin, M. (2025). State-Sponsored Qur’anic Exegesis and Interreligious Relations: A Comparative Study of Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and Indonesia. Ascarya: Journal of Islamic Science, Culture, and Social Studies, 5(2), 280–292. https://doi.org/10.53754/iscs.v5i2.854

Similar Articles

1-10 of 60

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.