Analisis Psikologis Kontribusi Remaja di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0

Abstract

Teenagers are the millennial generation who have a fundamental role in the industrial revolution 4.0 era. Based on the 2019 infographic data regarding profiles of social media users in Indonesia, it has known that social media users are dominated by residents, with an age range of 18-34 years. This age range is a person's productive age, or the phase of adolescence and early adulthood. Then, the following questions arise, what is the condition of the youth in Ponorogo Regency? Do they understand this critical role? What are they doing in their digital lives? Are they following the spirit of the industrial revolution 4.0? Based on the results of the data analysis, it shows that the contributions of adolescents, both conceptually and contextually, were formed based on adolescents' understanding of the industrial revolution 4.0. Conceptually, the comprehension of adolescents in Ponorogo Regency about the 4.0 industrial revolution is still limited to an understanding of the opportunities and challenges they face. They do not fully understand the concept of the 4.0 era. This understanding will shape the extent of contextual contributions of youth in the 4.0 era. The role of youth in Ponorogo Regency is still low, only reaching 34.5%. However, their contributions are quite diverse, starting from the fields of business, education, and social activities. Cognitively, the contribution of adolescents, both conceptually and contextually, is formed through a cognitive process that includes remembering, understanding, applying, analyzing, evaluating, and creating. From this process, the youth of Ponorogo Regency is still at the applying stage, namely how teenagers use a procedure to solve a problem that is happening or in doing a given task.

References

1. Ardianto, Robi. Revolusi Industry 4.0, Tak Hanya Indonesia Yang Gagap. Diunduh dari https://www.alinea.id/nasional/revolusi-industri-4-0-tak-hanya-indonesia-yang-gagap-b1Uzq9bBy
2. Bernard, H. Russel. Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. UK: ALTAMIRA PRESS.
3. Carey, Susan. “The Origin Of Concept”. Journal of Cognition And Development. 1(1):37-41. Februari 2000. Diakses dan diunduh dari https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228828863_The_Origin_of_Concepts pada 17 September 2018.
4. Creswell, John W. Penelitian Kualitatif Dan Desain Riset: Memilih Diantara Lima Pendekatan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka pelajar, 2015.
5. Crnjac, Marina et al., From Concept to the Introduction of Industry 4.0. International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, Vol 8 No. 1, 2017.
6. Diaz, Chris. To the Global Youth; On Embracing Industry 4.0 (The fourth industrial revolution). Diakses dari http://diazchris.com/to-the-global-youth-on-embracing-industry-4-0-the-fourth-industrial-revolution/, akses21 Agustus 2019.
7. Evangelos, Triantaphyllou. Multi-criteria decision making methods: a comparative study. Applied optimization. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. P. 320. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4757-3157-6. ISBN 0792366077.
8. Flick, Uwe. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis. London: SAGE Publishing. 2013.
9. Galotti, Kathleen M. Cognitive Development: Infancy Trough Adolescence. Second Edition. CA: Sage Publication. Inc. 2017.
10. George E, Monahan. Management Decision Making: Spreadsheet Modeling, Analysis, and Application. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press. 2000.
11. Groome, David and Michael W. Eysenck, An Introduction To Applied Cognitive Psychology, NY: Roudledge, 2016.
12. Harris, Richard Jackson and Fred W. Sanbron, A Cognitive Psychology of Mass Communications, NY: Roudledge, 2014.
13. Harususilo, Yohannes Enggar, Kemenristek: Pendidikan Jadi Penentu Daya Saing Global. Diunduh dari https://edukasi.kompas.com/read/2018/08/30/18165941/kemenristek-pendidikan-jadi-penentu-daya-saing-global.
14. Hills, Peter J., and Dr. J. Michael Pake, Cognitive Psychology For Dummies, UK: John Willey & Sons, Ltd., 2016.
15. Howe, Neil & William Strauss. Millennials Rising: The Next Great Generation. New York: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group. 2009.
16. Krathwohl, David R. “A Revision of Bloom Taxonomy”. Journal of Theory into Practice, Vol. 41. Number 4, Autumn 2002. P. 212-218.
17. Mannheim, Karl. “The Problem of Generations”. In Kecskemeti, Paul (ed.). Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge: Collected Works, Volume 5. New York: Routledge. 1952.
18. Mar’at, Samsunuwiyati dan Lieke Indieningsih K. Perilaku Manusia: Pengantar Singkat Tentang Psikologi. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama. 2006.
19. Margono, Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 1998.
20. Massepe, Andi Nur Bau. Making Indonesia 4.0 Babak Baru Industri Kita. Artikel diunduh dari https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325683480_MAKING_INDONESIA_40_BABAK_BARU_INDUSTRI_KITA.
21. McKinsey & Company. Jobs Lost, Jobs Gained: Workforce Transitions in a Time of Automation. New York: McKinsey Global Institute, 2017.
22. Minhaji, Akhmad. Strategis For Social Research: The Methodological Imagination In Islamic Studies. Yogyakarta: Sunan Kalijaga Press, 2009.
23. Morrar, Rabeh, Husam Arman, and Saeed Mousa, “The Fourth Industrial Revolution (Industry 4.0): A Social Innovation Perspective”. Technology Innovation Management Review, Volume 7, Issue 11, November 2017.
24. Pertiwi, Wahyunanda Kusuma, Mayoritas Orang Indonesia Bisa Internetan Seharian. Diunduh dari https://tekno.kompas.com/read/2018/02/22/12010087/mayoritas-orang-indonesia-bisa-internetan-seharian.
25. Putra, Yanuar Surya. Theoretical Review: Teori Perbedaan Generasi. Among Makarti Vol. 9 No. 18, Desember 2016, 123-134.
26. Quipper Campus, Tantangan Di Era Revolusi Industry 4.0 Bagi Perguruan Tinggi Di Indonesia. Diunduh dari https://www.quipper.com/id/blog/quipper-campus/campus-info/revolusi-industri-4-0/ pada tanggal 01 Agustus 2018.
27. Reed, Stephen K. Kognisi: Teori dan aplikasi. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika, 2011.
28. Reyes, Victoria et al. Why Do Field Research. Book Chapter. Diunduh dari http://icta.uab.cat/Etnoecologia/Docs/[312]-Why%20do.pdf.
29. Ryder, Norman B. “The Cohort as a Concept In The Study of Social Change”. American Sociological Review, Volume 30 (6). Publised By: American Sosiological Association, 1965, p. 843-861.
30. Rojko, Andreja. “Industry 4.0 Concept: Background and Overview”. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies Vol 11 No. 5, 2017.
31. Rosyadi, Slamet. Revolusi Industri 4.0: Peluang dan Tantangan bagi Universitas Terbuka. The Indonesian Jurnal of Public Administration (IJPA), 3 (2), 2017. 12-32.
32. Satryo Soemantri Brodjonegoro. Kecakapan Era 4.0. Kompas: Opini, 14 Februari 2018.
33. Schwab, Klaus. The fourth Industrial Revolution. Switzerland: Wordl Economic Forum. 2016.
34. Setyadi, Salni. Bersiaplah memasuki revolusi industri 4.0. Diunduh dari https://beritagar.id/artikel/editorial/bersiaplah-memasuki-revolusi-industri-40.
35. Solso, Robert L., dkk. Psikologi Kognitif. Jakarta: Erlangga, 2007.
36. Suwardana, Hendra. Revolusi Industri 4.0 Berbasis Revolusi Mental. Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik dan Manajemen Industri (JATI UNIK), Vol. 1 No.2, 2017.
37. Tim Penyusun. Statistik Gender Tematik: Profil Generasi Milenial Indonesia. Kerjasama Kementerian Pemberdayaan Perempuan dan Perlindungan Anak dengan Badan Pusat Statistik, 2018.
38. Vishal K J, Kevin. “Industrial Revolution 4.0”. GRD Journals: Global Research and Development Journal for Engineering. March 2017.
39. Yosep, Iyus. Keperawatan Jiwa, Edisi 1. Jakarta: Refika Aditama 2007.
40. Zirbel, Esther L. “Learning, Concept Formation, and Conceptual Change”. Tuft University Journal. 2014. P.08. Diakses dari https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/d97f/ec68fc3299c244a2eeb55c99ee322bddb9a8.pdf pada tanggal 08 September 2018.

License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2023 Ika Rusdiana

Indexing & Citations