Social Studies

Helmy Ziaul Fuad¹✉ , Tohir Luth² , Siti Hamidah³ , Rachmi Sulistyarini⁴

https://doi.org/10.53754/iscs.v3i2.638

Abstract

This article examines the nuanced application of the contra legem principle by judicial panels in the adjudication of community property cases, particularly in the context of marital property. It highlights the evolving legal landscape and the importance of equitable distribution in contemporary law, underscoring the need to understand judicial reasoning in an era increasingly focused on fairness and gender equality. The study closely examines cases from religious courts, highlighting a trend in which judges have awarded a disproportionate share of community property to wives. This observation raises important questions about the balance between legal norms and the pursuit of equity in family law, and provides a critical lens through which to explore the dynamics of asset distribution and its broader implications in current legal frameworks. The research aims not only to outline judges' distribution formulas, but also to offer insights into why such decisions are increasingly relevant in today's legal discourse, marking a significant shift toward recognizing the complexities of marital property division. This study uses qualitative research methods with a legal descriptive analysis approach. A thorough legal source is case number 413/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Tng and a number of other legal materials related to the author's research topic. The results of the study show that the panel of judges applied the contra legem principle in deciding this matter based on sociological considerations and distributive justice.

Keywords: Contra Legem Equitable Distribution Family Law Joint Property Marital Property

References

1. Asnawi, N. (2020). Hukum Harta Bersama. Jakarta: Kencana.
2. Fauzan. (2018). Kaidah Penemuan Hukum Yurisprudensi Bidang Hukum Perdata. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.
3. Gobel, R. T. S., Husnan, M. I., Nggilu, N., Adnan, R. S., & Muhtar, M. H. (2022). Local Legislation on Qur'anic Education in Gorontalo Province Were Crafted Using a Hybrid of Islamic Law and Positive Law. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 5(4), 30870.
4. Harahap, T. K., Prayuti, Y., Latianingsih, N., Damanik, A., Maheni, T., Farida, I., & Muhtar, M. H. (2023). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Penerbit Tahta Media.
5. Harahap, Y. (2009). Hukum Acara Pedata tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian, dan Putusan Pengadilan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
6. Kementerian Agama RI. (1974). Undang-Undang Perkawinan No 1 Tahun 1974.
7. Mahkamah Agung RI. (2022). Laporan Tahunan 2022.
8. Mahkamah Agung RI. (2022). Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 503 K/Ag/2022.
9. Manan, A. (2013). Penemuan Hukum Oleh Hakim Dalam Praktek Hukum Acara Di Peradilan Agama. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 2(2), 189-202. https://www.jurnalhukumdanperadilan.org/index.php/jurnalhukumperadilan/article/view/113
10. Mappiase, S. (2021). Logika Hukum Pertimbangan Putusan Hakim. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.
11. Muhtar, M. H., & Kasim, N. M. (2023). Peraturan Daerah Syariah dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia. Eureka Media Aksara.
12. Muhtar, M. H., Tribakti, I., Salim, A., Tuhumury, H. A., Ubaidillah, M. H., Imran, S. Y., Laka, I., Saragih, G. M., Iping, B., Amin, F., Amalia, M., Syamsiah, N., Riza, K., Sidiq Widodo, M. F., & Churniawan, E. (2023). Konsep Hukum Indonesia. Global Eksekutif Teknologi.
13. Mulyadi, L. (2009). Putusan hakim dalam Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti.
14. Nurdin, A. F. (2009). Wanita Islam dan Transformasi Sosial Keagamaan (Studi tentang Relevansi Perubahan Pencaharian Nafkah di Pedesaan). Yogyakarta: Gama Media.
15. Nasution, B. J. (2008). Metode Penelitian Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Mandar Maju.
16. Pemerintah RI. (1974). Undang-Undang No 1 tahun 1974, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia tahun 1974 nomor 1.
17. Pemerintah RI. (2009). Undang-Undang No. 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.
18. Pengadilan Agama Banten. (2021). Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Agama Banten Nomor 91/Pdt.G/2021/PTA.Btn.
19. Pengadilan Agama Tangerang. (2021). Putusan Pengadilan Agama Tanggerang Nomor 413/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Tng.
20. Rogaiyah. (2018). Putusan Contra Legem Sebagai Implementasi Penemuan Hukum Oleh Hakim di Peradilan Agama (Studi Kasus Putusan Kasasi Nomor 16K/AG/2010 dan Putusan Kasasi Nomor 110K/AG/AG/2017). Qiyas, 3(2), 193-206. https://ejournal.iainbengkulu.ac.id/index.php/QIYAS/article/view/1316
21. Sari, M. Y. A. R., , Husain, H., Amalia, M., Muannif Ridwan, Jumaah, S. H., Septiani, R., Idris, M., Sari, D. C., Ayu, R. K., & Soleh, H. W. (2023). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. In Nuta Media (Issue May, pp. 7–10). Nuta Media.
22. Sutiyoso, B. (2012). Metode Penemuan Hukum: Upaya Mewujudkan Hukum Yang Pasti dan Berkeadilan. Yogyakarta: UII Press.
23. Ter Har. (1960). Asas-Asas Dan Susun Hukum Adat. Jakarta: Negara Pradnya Paramita.
24. Tim Penyusun Kompilasi Hukum Islam. (1974). Kompilasi Hukum Islam BAB XIII tentang Harta Kekayaan Dalam Perkawinan Pasal 85-97.
25. Vandijk, R. (1954). Pengantar Hukum Adat. Bandung: Vorknik Van Hoeve.

License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2023 Helmy Ziaul Fuad, Tohir Luth, Siti Hamidah, Rachmi Sulistyarini

Indexing & Citations