Collaborative Learning in Computer Labs for Science Education

Abstract

This study analyzes the use of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) in computer laboratory settings for secondary school science education. The literature review evaluates the impact of collaborative methods using computer simulations, virtual experiments, and other digital technologies. The search yielded 33 relevant studies, indicating that collaborative conditions outperformed individual laboratory work in computer environments across various measures. Collaborative work in pairs or small teams has been shown to lead to better learning outcomes and expert-like reasoning patterns. Additionally, students have reported finding collaborative computer laboratory work more enjoyable, engaging, and preferable to independent work. The integration of computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) into science education presents opportunities to enhance students' learning experiences through interactive and collaborative approaches. This study highlights the importance of student-centered learning design, effective group dynamics, and reliable technology infrastructure for successful CSCL implementation. Additional research is required to identify the best group composition and task design, as well as the implications for effectively implementing computer-supported collaborative learning in science laboratories.

References

1. Abdullah, R. S. A., & Qolamani, R. K. I. B. (2024). The Ethical and Social Implications of using Artificial Intelligence in Social Studies Instruction. Lark, 52(1), 782–762.
2. Brown, P. C., Roediger III, H. L., & McDaniel, M. A. (2014). Make it stick: The science of successful learning. Harvard University Press.
3. Chang, K.-E., Chen, Y.-L., Lin, H.-Y., & Sung, Y.-T. (2008). Effects of learning support in simulation-based physics learning. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1486–1498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.01.007
4. Chen, J., Wang, M., Kirschner, P. A., & Tsai, C.-C. (2018). The Role of Collaboration, Computer Use, Learning Environments, and Supporting Strategies in CSCL: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 88(6), 799–843. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318791584
5. Chernikova, O., Heitzmann, N., Stadler, M., Holzberger, D., Seidel, T., & Fischer, F. (2020). Simulation-Based Learning in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 90(4), 499–541. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320933544
6. Chi, M. T. H. (2009). Active‐Constructive‐Interactive: A Conceptual Framework for Differentiating Learning Activities. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(1), 73–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01005.x
7. Dahal, N. (2022). Understanding and uses of collaborative tools for online courses in higher education. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 2(2), 435–442. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2022.02.012
8. De Jong, T., & Van Joolingen, W. R. (1998). Scientific Discovery Learning with Computer Simulations of Conceptual Domains. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 179–201. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068002179
9. Dutta, S. J., & Bhattacharjee, R. (2019). Integration of Virtual Laboratories: A Step Toward Enhancing E-learning Technology. 2019 IEEE 5th International Conference for Convergence in Technology (I2CT), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/I2CT45611.2019.9033848
10. Gadgil, S., Nokes-Malach, T. J., & Chi, M. T. H. (2012). Effectiveness of holistic mental model confrontation in driving conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 22(1), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.06.002
11. Gunstone, R. F. (2012). Learners in science education. In Developments and dilemmas in science education (pp. 73–95). Routledge.
12. Higgins, S., Mercier, E., Burd, L., & Joyce‐Gibbons, A. (2012). Multi‐touch tables and collaborative learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(6), 1041–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01259.x
13. Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Chernobilsky, E., & Jordan, R. (2008). Understanding collaborative learning processes in new learning environments. Instructional Science, 36(5–6), 409–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9063-8
14. Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kanselaar, G., & Jaspers, J. (2007). Visualization of participation: Does it contribute to successful computer-supported collaborative learning? Computers & Education, 49(4), 1037–1065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.01.004
15. Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P. A., & Kanselaar, G. (2009). Influence of group member familiarity on online collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(1), 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.08.010
16. Jeong, H., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Jo, K. (2019). Ten years of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning: A meta-analysis of CSCL in STEM education during 2005–2014. Educational Research Review, 28, 100284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100284
17. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2013). Cooperation and the use of technology. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 777–803). Routledge.
18. Johnson, R. T., & Johnson, D. W. (1986). Cooperative learning in the science classroom. Science and Children, 24(2), 31–32.
19. Liu, D., Valdiviezo-Díaz, P., Riofrio, G., Sun, Y.-M., & Barba, R. (2015). Integration of Virtual Labs into Science E-learning. Procedia Computer Science, 75, 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.224
20. M. Tarun, I. (2019). The Effectiveness of a Customized Online Collaboration Tool for Teaching and Learning. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 18, 275–292. https://doi.org/10.28945/4367
21. Mercier, E. M., & Higgins, S. E. (2013). Collaborative learning with multi-touch technology: Developing adaptive expertise. Learning and Instruction, 25, 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.10.004
22. Mercier, E. M., Higgins, S. E., & Da Costa, L. (2014). Different leaders: Emergent organizational and intellectual leadership in children’s collaborative learning groups. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 9(4), 397–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-014-9201-z
23. Mohammed, R. S., Kamal Saeed, N., & Ilias Basheer, K. (2019). اثراستخدام انموذج فراير في تحصيل طلبة الصف الحادي عشر لمادة الجغرافية وتنمية استطلاعهم الجغرافي. The Journal of University of Duhok, 22(2), 127–167. https://doi.org/10.26682/hjuod.2019.22.2.8
24. Noroozi, O., Weinberger, A., Biemans, H. J. A., Mulder, M., & Chizari, M. (2012). Argumentation-Based Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (ABCSCL): A synthesis of 15 years of research. Educational Research Review, 7(2), 79–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2011.11.006
25. Olympiou, G., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2012). Blending physical and virtual manipulatives: An effort to improve students’ conceptual understanding through science laboratory experimentation. Science Education, 96(1), 21–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20463
26. Papaconstantinou, M., Kilkenny, D., Garside, C., Ju, W., Najafi, H., & Harrison, L. (2021). Virtual Lab Integration in Undergraduate Courses: Insights from Course Design and Implementation. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 46(3). https://doi.org/10.21432/cjlt27853
27. Pope, D. S., Rounds, C. M., & Clarke-Midura, J. (2017). Testing the effectiveness of two natural selection simulations in the context of a large-enrollment undergraduate laboratory class. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 10(1), 1–16.
28. Qolamani, K. (2022). Effectiveness of Online Teaching & Learning during Covid-19 Pandemic—Social Studies Students’ Perspective. Humanities Journal of University of Zakho, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.26436/hjuoz.2022.10.3.866
29. Qolamani, K. I. B., & Kaya, E. (2024). Exploring the New Social Studies Curriculum at the Third Cycle of Basic Education: Interviews with Curriculum Planners in Erbil Sulaymaniyah and Duhok in Iraq. Aksara: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Nonformal, 10(1), 495–526.
30. Qolamani, K. I. B., & Mohammed, M. M. (2023). The Digital Revolution in Higher Education: Transforming Teaching and Learning. QALAMUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, Dan Agama, 15(2), 837–846. https://doi.org/10.37680/qalamuna.v15i2.3905
31. Radulović, B., Županec, V., Stojanović, M., & Budić, S. (2022). Gender motivational gap and contribution of different teaching approaches to female students’ motivation to learn physics. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 18224. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-23151-7
32. Raes, A., Schellens, T., De Wever, B., & Vanderhoven, E. (2012). Scaffolding information problem solving in web-based collaborative inquiry learning. Computers & Education, 59(1), 82–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.11.010
33. Resta, P., & Laferrière, T. (2007). Technology in Support of Collaborative Learning. Educational Psychology Review, 19(1), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9042-7
34. Rutakomozibwa, A. (2024). EFFECT OF COMPUTER SIMULATIONS ON FEMALE STUDENTS’ MOTIVATION FOR AND ENGAGEMENT WITH PHYSICS LEARNING: A CASE. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.36130.81608
35. Rutten, N., Van Joolingen, W. R., & Van Der Veen, J. T. (2012). The learning effects of computer simulations in science education. Computers & Education, 58(1), 136–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.017
36. Saleh, M., Lazonder, A. W., & Jong, T. D. (2007). Structuring collaboration in mixed-ability groups to promote verbal interaction, learning, and motivation of average-ability students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(3), 314–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.05.001
37. Shaffer, D., & Ruis, A. (2017). Epistemic network analysis: A worked example of theory-based learning analytics. Handbook of Learning Analytics.
38. Tao, P., & Gunstone, R. F. (1999). The process of conceptual change in force and motion during computer‐supported physics instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 36(7), 859–882. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199909)36:7<859::AID-TEA7>3.0.CO;2-J
39. Van Joolingen, W. R., De Jong, T., & Dimitrakopoulou, A. (2007). Issues in computer supported inquiry learning in science. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(2), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00216.x
40. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society. The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University.
41. Wang, M., Cheng, B., Chen, J., Mercer, N., & Kirschner, P. A. (2017). The use of web-based collaborative concept mapping to support group learning and interaction in an online environment. The Internet and Higher Education, 34, 28–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.04.003

License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 Hakar J. Mohammed Salih, Jahwar Y. Arif , Shaimaa Q. Sabri

Indexing & Citations