Social Studies

Valentania Ratna Sari¹✉ , Budi Santoso² , Arini Jauharoh³

https://doi.org/10.53754/iscs.v4i1.671

Abstract

This study examines the crucial role of sign language interpreters in assisting deaf individuals as clients. This study reveals a disparity in the Indonesian legal system when it comes to providing support for individuals with hearing impairments (deaf people) compared to the comprehensive framework in the United States, which mandates accommodations through legislation such as the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) and the American Disabilities Act (ADA). This study uses a normative juridical approach, analyzing legal texts, and a comparative framework to identify best practices and deficiencies in the current Indonesian system. The results indicate a lack of legal provisions for sign language interpreters in Indonesia, leading to potential miscommunication and legal misunderstandings among deaf clients. The conclusion emphasizes that notaries, as public officials, are required to optimize their services to the public, reflecting an ethical and professional commitment to providing fair and equal services, even in the face of inadequate legal frameworks. Practical implications suggest that implementing these changes will not only uphold the principles of justice and equality, but also enhance the effectiveness and inclusivity of legal services for the deaf community in Indonesia.

Keywords: American Disabilities Act deaf individuals hearing impairments Indonesian legal system notaries sign language interpreters

References

1. Adam Jose Sihombing, G. W. A. (2024). Kewajiban Notaris Membacakan Akta Autentik Bagi Penghadap Disabilitas Rungu. Jurnal USM Law Review, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v7i1.8489
2. Aisyiah, C., & Wisnuwardhani, D. A. (2022). Notary, public official or public official: Implications for the position of notary. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 13(3), 242–252. https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v13i3.9012
3. Amiruddin, H. (2012). Zainal Asikin, Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
4. Arduin, S. (2019). Taking Metaregulation to the United Nations Human Rights Treaty Regime: The Case of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Law & Policy, 41(4), 411–431. https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12136
5. Baker, P. M. A., Linden, M. A., LaForce, S. S., Rutledge, J., & Goughnour, K. P. (2018). Barriers to Employment Participation of Individuals With Disabilities: Addressing the Impact of Employer (Mis)Perception and Policy. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(5), 657–675. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218768868
6. Bogart, K. R., Logan, S. W., Hospodar, C., & Woekel, E. (2019). Disability models and attitudes among college students with and without disabilities. Stigma and Health, 4(3), 260–263. https://doi.org/10.1037/sah0000142
7. Bonaccio, S., Connelly, C. E., Gellatly, I. R., Jetha, A., & Martin Ginis, K. A. (2020). The Participation of People with Disabilities in the Workplace Across the Employment Cycle: Employer Concerns and Research Evidence. Journal of Business and Psychology, 35(2), 135–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-018-9602-5
8. Degener, T. (2016). Disability in a Human Rights Context. Laws, 5(3), 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws5030035
9. Dejong, G., Palsbo, S. E., & Beatty, P. W. (2002). 1. The Organization and Financing of Health Services for Persons with Disabilities. The Milbank Quarterly, 80(2), 261–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.t01-1-00004
10. Dwiyanto, A. (2021). Mewujudkan good governance melalui pelayanan publik. Ugm Press.
11. Eta Yuni Lestari & Slamet Sumarto. (2021). Pemenuhan Hak Bekerja Bagi Penyandang disabilitas di Kota Semarang. Integralistik, 33(1).
12. Fajar ND, M. (2010). Dualisme penelitian hukum: Normatif & empiris. Pustaka Pelajar.
13. Harley, J. E. (1949). FENWICK, CHARLES G. International Law. (Third edition.) Pp. xlix, 744. New York and London: Appleton-Century- Crofts, 1948. $5.00. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 261(1), 182–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/000271624926100124
14. Hastomo Aji, M. R. (2020). Studi Komparatif Penyediaan Penerjemah Terhadap Penghadap Notaris Tuli Di Indonesia Dan Jepang. Jurnal Lex Renaissance, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol5.iss1.art13
15. Hedlund, D. (2017). Constructions of credibility in decisions concerning unaccompanied minors. International Journal of Migration, Health and Social Care, 13(2), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMHSC-02-2016-0010
16. International Labour Organization. (n.d.). Inklusi Penyandang Disabilitas di Indonesia. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://webapps.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---asia/---ro-bangkok/---ilo-jakarta/documents/publication/wcms_233426.pdf
17. Lestari, E. Y., & Sumarto, S. (2021). Pemenuhan Hak Bekerja Bagi Penyandang disabilitas di Kota Semarang. Integralistik, 32(1), 45–51. https://doi.org/10.15294/integralistik.v33i1.28731
18. Mustaniemi-Laakso, M., Katsui, H., & Heikkilä, M. (2023). Vulnerability, Disability, and Agency: Exploring Structures for Inclusive Decision-Making and Participation in a Responsive State. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique, 36(4), 1581–1609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-022-09946-x
19. Nassim, J. S., Watson, A. J., & Tan, J. K. (2020). Achieving Equitable Care for People With Disabilities: Considerations for the Dermatologist. JAMA Dermatology, 156(11), 1173. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.3955
20. National Association of the Deaf. (2015). Legal Rights, 6th Ed.: The Guide for Deaf and Hard of Hearing People. Gallaudet University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv2rr3frc
21. Ouellet, D., & Perrier, J.-P. (2018). Prix de vente des fermes au Québec. Divergence de vue entre les besoins des cédants et des repreneurs. Économie Rurale, 363, 65–80. https://doi.org/10.4000/economierurale.5412
22. Owens Swift, C., Way, J. P., & Wayland, R. (1994). The Americans with Disabilities Act 1990: Guidelines forIndustrial Sales Managers. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 9(3), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1108/08858629410066836
23. Porter, A., Creed, P., Hood, M., & Ching, T. Y. C. (2018). Parental Decision-Making and Deaf Children: A Systematic Literature Review. The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 23(4), 295–306. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/eny019
24. Pudjiastuti, T. N., Purwaningsih, S. S., Budiarti, M., Yohanitas, W. A., Wulandari, P. R., A., G. C., & Hermawati, W. (2022). Naskah Kebijakan Pengembangan Riset Teknologi Alat Bantu bagi Penyandang Disabilitas: Rekomendasi Kebijakan Komite Nasional MOST-UNESCO Indonesia. Penerbit BRIN. https://doi.org/10.55981/brin.679
25. Purbasari, P. (2018). Kajian Perlindungan Employee Invention terhadap Penyalahgunaan Keadaan (Misbruik Van Omstandigheden) dalam Perjanjian Kerja. Jurnal Meta Yuridis, 36–48. https://doi.org/10.26877/m-y.v1i2.2865
26. Ramadhanty, S., & Budianto, A. (2023). Pemberian Persetujuan yang Sah Terhadap Akta Notaris yang Dibuat oleh Difabel Tanpa Sidik Jari [Giving Valid Approval on Notarial Deed with Disabled Party without Fingerprints. Notary Journal, 3(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.19166/nj.v3i1.6732
27. Setiawan, E. A., Hamidah, S., & Istislam. (2018). KONSEP DAN KRITERIA KECAKAPAN BERTINDAK BAGI PENYANDANG DISABULITAS AUTISME MENURUT PERSEFEKTIF HUKUM PERDATA INDONESIA. Jurnal Selat, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.31629/selat.v5i2.554
28. Soekanto, S. (2007). Penelitian hukum normatif: Suatu tinjauan singkat.
29. Spiro, H. J. (1969). Responsibility in government: Theory and practice. (No Title).
30. Subarsono, A. (2021). BAB 4 Pelayanan Publik Yang Efisien, Responsif, dan Non-Partisan. Mewujudkan Good Governance Melalui Pelayanan Publik, 135.
31. Sukardi, D. H., & Herlambang, D. (2020). PENERAPAN PERJANJIAN KERJA ANTARA DIREKTUR DAN KARYAWAN TERKAIT DENGAN ASAS KEBEBASAN BERKONTRAK BERDASARKAN PASAL 1320 KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PERDATA. PRANATA HUKUM, 15(2), 163–171. https://doi.org/10.36448/pranatahukum.v15i2.226
32. Syafrudin, A. (2000). Menuju penyelenggaraan pemerintahan negara yang bersih dan bertanggung jawab. Jurnal Pro Justisia Edisi IV, Universitas Parahyangan, Bandung, 22.
33. Tri Nuke Pudjiastuti, Sri Sunarti Purwaningsih, Menik Budiarti, Witra Apdhi Yohanitas, Primatia Romana Wulandari, Gigay Citta A., & Wati Hermawati. (2022). Naskah Kebijakan Pengembangan Riset Teknologi Alat Bantu bagi Penyandang Disabilitas: Rekomendasi Kebijakan Komite Nasional MOST-UNESCO Indonesia. Penerbit BRIN. https://doi.org/10.55981/brin.679
34. Victor, C. M., Thacker, L. R., Gary, K. W., Pawluk, D. T. V., & Copolillo, A. (2017). Workplace Discrimination and Visual Impairment: A Comparison of Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Charges and Resolutions under the Americans with Disabilities Act and Americans with Disabilities Amendments Act. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 111(5), 475–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X1711100509
35. Weo, M. R. K., & Cahyandari, D. (2023). Pengaturan Pelekatan Sidik Jari Dalam Minuta Akta Bagi Penyandang Tuna Daksa (Vol. 12, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.24843/JMHU.2023.v12.i03.p11

License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 Valentania Ratna Sari, Budi Santoso, Arini Jauharoh

Indexing & Citations