The Application of Graphology in Assessing Deaf People's Communication and Social Interaction Abilities

Abstract

Graphology, the study of handwriting, has been used to interpret an individual's character and personality. This study examined the application of graphology in assessing the communication and social interaction abilities of deaf people. Deaf individuals face challenges in building social relationships and communicating with others because of their hearing impairment and reliance on nonverbal communication techniques such as sign language. Previous research has explored the potential of graphology in diagnosing attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and mental retardation as well as in revealing the psychological aspects of historical figures. However, few studies have investigated the application of graphology in assessing the counseling needs of deaf individuals. This study employed a qualitative approach to analyze the handwriting samples of deaf participants using graphological techniques. The findings revealed that intensifying and reducing signs in the handwriting of deaf individuals influenced their communication and social interaction abilities. This study highlights the potential of graphology as an alternative assessment tool for understanding the characteristics and conditions of deaf individuals, without relying on oral communication. These results contribute to the field of counseling by providing insights for assessors, such as psychologists and counselors, to develop appropriate interventions and approaches tailored to the unique needs of deaf individuals. Further research is recommended to explore the effectiveness of graphology-based interventions in enhancing communication and social interaction skills of deaf individuals.

References

1. Achsifinna. (2018). Menguak Rahasia Tulisan Tangan. Pt Niaga Swadaya.
2. Ainnayyah, R., Maulida, R. I., Ningtyas, A. A., & Istiana. (2019). Identifikasi Komunikasi Anak Berkebutuhan Khusus Dalam Interaksi Sosial. Jurnal Pendidikan Inklus, 3(1), 48–52. https://doi.org/10.26740/inklusi.v3n1.p48-52
3. Amka, A., & Mirnawati, M. (2020). Inclusive Practices : Strengthening Character Through Social Participation Of Deaf Students. Pedagogia:Jurnal Pendidikan, 9(2), 243–258. Https://Doi.Org/10.21070/Pedagogia.V9i2.280
4. Anggara, E. B. R., & Wagino. (2018). Penyaluran Tenaga Kerja Anak Tunarungu Pasca Smalb Diajukan Kepada Universitas Negeri Surabaya Untuk Memenuhi Persyaratan Penyelesaian Program Sarjana Pendidikan Luar Biasa Oleh Eka Boma Rezi Anggara Jurusan Pendidikan Luar Biasa. Jurnal Pendidikan Khusus, 1(2), 1–15.
5. Dapa, A. N., & Mangantes, M. L. (2021). Bimbingan Konseling Anak Berkebutuhan Khusus. Deepublish.
6. Dwikardana, Sapta, Emmy, & Rosalia. (2019). Practical Handbook Of Graphologi : Pedoman Praktis Membaca Karakter Melalui Tulisan Tangan. Kanisius.
7. Fadhilla, M., Saf, M. R. A., & Sahid, D. S. S. (2017). Pengenalan Kepribadian Seseorang Berdasarkan Pola Tulisan Tangan Menggunakan Jaringan Saraf Tiruan. Jurnal Nasional Teknik Elektro Dan Teknologi Informasi (Jnteti), 6(3), 365–373. Https://Doi.Org/10.22146/Jnteti.V6i3.340
8. Fauzi, W. I., & Yulianti, I. (2022). Jejak-Jejak Psikologis Dalam Tulisan Tangan Bung Karno. Jurnal Sejarah Citra Lekha, 7(1), 58–73. https://doi.org/10.14710/jscl.v7i1.36521
9. Grutta, S. La, Piombo, M. A., Spicuzza, V., Riolo, M., Fanara, I., Trombini, E., Andrei, F., & Epifanio, M. S. (2023). The Relationship Between Knowing Sign Language And Quality Of Life Among Italian People Who Are Deaf : A Cross-Sectional Study. Healthcare, 11(1021), 1–11.
10. Hasan, M., Harahap, T. K., Hasibuan, S., Rodliyah, I., Thalhah, S. Z., Rakhman, C. U., Ratnaningsih, P. W., Inanna, Mattunruang, A. A., Herman, Nursaeni, Yusriani, Nahriana, Silalahi, D. E., Hasyim, S. H., Rahmat, A., Ulfah, Y. F., & Arisah, N. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Tahta Media Group.
11. Hasri, F., & Permadi, S. R. (2023). Seminar Pendidikan Inklusi : Mengenal Lebih Dekat Anak Berkebutuhan Khusus ( Abk ) Di Tk & Play Group Naurah Makassar. Karya: Journal Of Educational Community Service, 2(1), 1–8.
12. Herdiyanti, M. (2017). Pelaksanaan Strategi Layanan Bimbingan Dan Konseling Bagi Siswa Tunarungu Di Sdlb Colomadu. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.1-98
13. Hidayat, T., Gutji, N., & Sekonda, F. A. (2022). Upaya Guru Bimbingan Dan Konseling Dalam Menangani Masalah Anak Berkebutuhan Khusus Tunarungu Dan Tunawicara Di Smkn 4 Kota Jambi. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 6(1), 2517–2521. https://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/55468
14. Isma, S. T. (2018). Meneliti Bahasa Isyarat Dalam Perspektif Variasi Bahasa. Kongres Bahasa Indonesia, 1(2), 1–14.
15. Jannah, F., & Gumelar, R. G. (2024). Teknik Komunikasi Barista Tunarungu Sunyi Coffee Dengan Konsumen. Perspektif Komunikasi: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi Politik Dan Komunikasi Bisnis, 8(1), 57–66.
16. Juherna, E., Putri, A. F., Sugihartini, E., Valentina, F., Mutmainah, L. H., & Ramadhaniati, V. (2021). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Membaca Pemahaman Pada Anak Tunarungu. Journal Pelita Paud, 5(2), 256–261. https://doi.org/10.33222/pelitapaud.v6i2.1598
17. Karosh, E. M. (2022). Pre-Master Course Of Handwriting Analysis Graphology. Karohs International School.
18. Kushalnagar, P., Reesman, J., Holcomb, T., & Ryan, C. (2019). Prevalence Of Anxiety Or Depression Diagnosis In Deaf Adults. Journal Ofdeaf Studies And Deaf Education, 24(4), 378–385. Https://Doi.Org/10.1093/Deafed/Enz017
19. Lesmana, G. (2021). Bimbingan Konseling Populasi Khusus. Prenada Media.
20. Lestari, Y. I., & Laksono, K. (2022). Implementasi Pola Tulisan Tangan Untuk Memahami Karakter Siswa Kelas 1 Sdn Sumberjati 1. Bapala, 9(1), 62–78. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/bapala/article/view/44896
21. Ludvianto, B. (2020). Analisis Tulisan Tangan: Grapho For Success. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
22. Marano, G., Traversi, G., Gaetani, E., Sani, G., & Mazza, S. (2020). Review Article Graphology : An Interface Between Biology , Psychology And Neuroscience. Psychological Disorders And Research, 3(3), 1–13. Https://Doi.Org/10.31487/J.Pdr.2020.03.05
23. Michon, J. H. (1884). Système de graphologie. Ghio. Retrieved from http://books.google.com/books?id=gF0OAAAAYAAJ&oe=UTF-8
24. Muhammad, F. (2022). Yayasan Lembaga Pendidikan Islam Riau Universitas Islam Riau. Universitas Islam Riau.
25. Musman, A. (2019). Buku Ampuh Membaca Karakter Dan Kepribadian Melalui Tulisan Tangan Dan Tanda Tangan. Psikologi Corner.
26. Nasution, A. F. (2023). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Cv. Harfa Creative.
27. Nathan, P., Marschark, M., & Spencer, P. E. (2016). The Oxford Handbook Of Deaf Studies, Language, And Education. Oxford University Press. Https://Doi.Org/10.1093/Oxfordhb/9780195390032.001.0001
28. Nofiaturrahmah, F. (2018). Problematika Anak Tunarungu Dan Cara Mengatasinya. Quality, 6(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.21043/quality.v6i1.5744
29. Pahleviannur, M. R., Grave, A. De, Dani Nur Saputra, S.Pd, M. S. D. M., Sinthania, D., Hafrida, L., Bano, V. O., Susanto, E. E., Mahardhani, A. J., Amruddin, Alam, M. D. S., Lisya, M., & Ahyar, D. B. (2022). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Pradina Pustaka.
30. Pangestuti, D. (2021). Pemberdayaan Penyandang Disabilitas Fisik Melalui Pelatihan Vokasional Pada Program Rehabilitasi Sosial (Studi Kasus Di Balai Besar Rehabilitasi Sosial Penyandang Disabilitas Fisik “Prof. Dr. Soeharso” Surakarta). In Jurnal Kewidyaiswaraan (Vol. 6, Issue 1, Pp. 1–10). https://doi.org/10.36709/bening.v2i1.10580
31. Rachman, A., Awaru, A. O. T., & Anrical. (2022). S5-Interaksi Sosial Dan Pola Komunikasi Siswa Penyandang Tunarungu Di Sekola H Luar Biasa (Slb-B Ypplb Makassar). Phinisi Integration Review, 5(1), 1–14. Http://Ojs.Unm.Ac.Id/Pir
32. Rahayu, D., Nurdin, N., Fauziah, S., & Mansur, M. (2023). Model Komunikasi Guru Dan Tenaga Kependidikan Terhadap Siswa Tunarungu Di Slbn Konda. Al-Munzir, 16(2), 73. Https://Doi.Org/10.31332/Am.V16i2.4359
33. Rustamaji, E. A., & Harsiwi, N. E. (2024). Analisis Pola Komunikasi Pada Anak Berkebutuhan Khusus (Tunarungu) Di Slb Ayodya Tulada. Sumikolah : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 2(1), 1–8.
34. Safithry, & Aryani, E. (2018). Asesmen Teknik Tes Dan Non Tes. IRDH.
35. Siswanto. (2012). Grapologi. Libri.
36. Soekanto, S. (2009). Sosiologi Keluarga. Rineka Cipta.
37. Soekanto, S. (2018). Sosiologi Suatu Pengantar Edisi Revisi. Rajagrafindo Persada.
38. Soewito. (2019). Ortopedagogik Anak Tunarungu Edisi Revisi. Depdikbud RI.
39. Sumarto, & Harahap, E. K. (2020). Komunikasi Bimbingan Dan Konseling. Buku Literasiologi.
40. Susetyo, B., Homdijah, O. S., & Siswaningsih, W. (2023). Standarisasi Instrumen Tes Hasil Belajar Ipa Untuk Mengukur Kognitif Siswa Tunarungu. Uwais Inspirasi Indonesia.
41. Wahyu, N. F. (2023). Pengasuhan Anak Dengan Disabilitas. Dinas Perempuan Dan Anak Provinsi Jawa Tengah.
42. Wahyuni, S. E. (2018). Graphology For Us. Elex Media Komputindo.
43. Wibowo, M. E. (2018). Profesi Konseling Abad 21. Unnes Press.
44. Wibowo, U. D. A. (2022). Pelatihan Grafologi Untuk Guru Bimbingan Dan Konseling Sltp/Slta Muhammadiyah Di Kabupaten Banyumas. Jurnal Dharma Bhakti Ekuitas, 7(1), 57–61. Https://Doi.Org/10.52250/P3m.V7i1.570
45. Wiersma, W., & Jurs, S. G. (2019). Research Methods In Education: An Introduction. Pennsylvania State University.
46. Wiryanto. (2014). Pengantar Ilmu Komunikas. PT Grasindo.
47. Yudowati, K. A., & Lumajang, B. W. (2021). Pola Komunikasi Guru Agama Islam Dalam Membina Akhlak Anak Disabilitas. Nusantara: Indonesian Journal Of Islamic Studies, 1(1), 129–158.

License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 Dinna Rahmayani Zebua, Ira Wirtati

Indexing & Citations