Discovering the Presence of Fathers

Abstract

The evolving understanding of fatherhood has drawn increasing scholarly attention to paternal involvement as a key dimension of child development. In Indonesia, cultural expectations and economic pressures often restrict fathers’ direct participation in daily childcare, raising questions about how they negotiate their presence and involvement under such conditions. This study explores the nature of father involvement in the Madiun Residency, addressing the gap in understanding how limited physical time may be balanced by the quality of interaction. Using a mixed-methods design, quantitative data on the amount of daily father–child interaction were combined with qualitative interviews exploring fathers’ perceptions, emotional engagement, and caregiving styles. The analysis examined how time and quality relate to children’s developmental outcomes. The findings indicate that while physical interaction time is relatively limited, quality engagement plays a crucial role in supporting emotional and social development, whereas physical development correlates more directly with time spent together. Three typologies of fathering have been identified: permissive, democratic, and democratic–permissive. Each typology represents a distinct approach to paternal involvement and responsiveness, particularly within the constraints of time. The study concludes that effective paternal involvement in contemporary Indonesian families extends beyond the dimension of duration and is better understood through the quality, emotional resonance, and intentionality of fathers’ interactions with their children. These insights have practical implications for family education and policy initiatives aimed at strengthening meaningful father–child relationships.

References

1. Abdullah, S. M. (2010). Studi eksplorasi tentang peran ayah dalam pengasuhan anak usia dini. Jurnal Spirits, 1(1), 3–4.
2. Ansell, E. B., Gu, P., Tuit, K., & Sinha, R. (2012). Effects of cumulative stress and impulsivity on smoking status. Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental, 27(2), 200–208. https://doi.org/10.1002/hup.1269
3. Bengwasan, P. D. (2018). The intellectual profile of abused and neglected children in the Philippines: An analysis of SB5 IQ scores of sexually abused, physically abused and neglected children. Child Abuse & Neglect, 81, 389–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.05.019
4. Bond, S. (2020). The essential role of the father: Fostering a father-inclusive practice approach with immigrant and refugee families. In Social work practice with war-affected children (pp. 101–123). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780429295836-6/essential-role-father-fostering-father-inclusive-practice-approach-immigrant-refugee-families-sharon-bond
5. BPS, B. P. S. K. (2024). Keadaan Ketenagakerjaan Kabupaten Madiun Agustus 2024. https://madiunkab.bps.go.id/id/pressrelease/2024/12/09/47/keadaan-ketenagakerjaan-kabupaten-madiun-agustus-2024.html
6. Briggs, D. C. (2019). Interpreting and visualizing the unit of measurement in the Rasch Model. Measurement, 146, 961–971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2019.07.035
7. Casado Casado, B. (2021). Co-responsibility plan and shared parenting. In J. M. de Torres Perea, E. Kruk, & M. Ortiz-Tallo (Eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Shared Parenting and Best Interest of the Child (pp. 341–351). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003140566-32
8. Chang, R., Li, C., Wei, M., Jiang, Y., & Zhang, J. (2024). Associations of father absence and limited access to books and toys with early childhood development among children aged 0–6 years in a rural county lifted out of poverty in China. Child: Care, Health and Development, 50(1), e13145. https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.13145
9. Crespi, I., & Ruspini, E. (2015). Transition to fatherhood: New perspectives in the global context of changing men’s identities. International Review of Sociology, 25(3), 353–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2015.1078529
10. Elia, H. (2000). Peran Ayah dalam Mendidik Anak. https://doi.org/10.36421/veritas.v1i1.23
11. Fabiano, G. A., & Caserta, D. (2018). Future directions in father inclusion, engagement, retention, and positive outcomes in child and adolescent research. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 47(5), 847–862. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2018.1485107
12. Feldman, J. S., & Shaw, D. S. (2021). The Premise and Promise of Activation Parenting for Fathers: A Review and Integration of Extant Literature. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 24(3), 414–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-021-00351-7
13. Gordon, M. S. (2016). Father–child relationship, parental school involvement, and school outcomes in adolescence. Journal of Family Issues, 37(10), 1459–1481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X14537478
14. Hawkins, A. J., & Palkovitz, R. (1999). Beyond ticks and clicks: The need for more diverse and broader conceptualizations and measures of father involvement. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 8(1), 11–32. https://doi.org/10.3149/jms.0801.11
15. Istiyati, S., Nuzuliana, R., & Shalihah, M. (2020). Gambaran Peran Ayah dalam Pengasuhan. Profesi (Profesional Islam) : Media Publikasi Penelitian, 17(2), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.26576/profesi.v17i2.22
16. Jeong, J., Siyal, S., Fink, G., McCoy, D. C., & Yousafzai, A. K. (2018). “His mind will work better with both of us”: A qualitative study on fathers’ roles and coparenting of young children in rural Pakistan. BMC Public Health, 18(1), 1274. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-6143-9
17. Lestari, L. (2023). “Fatherman” On the Move: Social Transformation Strategy in Indonesian Family Education. Muslim Education Review, 2(2), 351–383. https://doi.org/10.56529/mer.v2i2.193
18. Maskalan, A. (2016). In the Name of the Father: A Discussion on (New) Fatherhood, Its Assumptions and Obstacles. Revija Za Socijalnu Politiku, 23(3), 383–398. https://doi.org/10.3935/rsp.v23i3.1295
19. Mirza, R., Marpaung, W., Marpaung, M. E., Putra, A. I. D., Aritonang, H. A., Tarigan, B. A., & Pinem, T. (2024). Literature Review: Commuter Marriage dan Peran Ayah dalam Pengasuhan Anak. ISLAMIKA GRANADA, 4(2), 83–89. https://doi.org/10.51849/ig.v4i2.180
20. Munjiat, S. M. (2017). Pengaruh fatherless terhadap karakter anak dalam prespektif Islam. Al-Tarbawi Al-Haditsah: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 2(1), 108–116.
21. Muslihatun, W. N., & Santi, M. Y. (2022). Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Keterlibatan Ayah dalam Pengasuhan Anak Usia Dini. Window of Health : Jurnal Kesehatan, 404–418. https://doi.org/10.33096/woh.vi.131
22. Nadeau, M.-E., & Nolin, P. (2013). Attentional and Executive Functions in Neglected Children. Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma, 6(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/19361521.2013.733794
23. O’Shaughnessy, K. (2009). Gender, State and Social Power in Contemporary Indonesia (0 ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203883983
24. Pleck, J. H. (2010). Paternal involvement: Revised conceptualization and theoretical linkages with child outcomes. In M. E. Lamb (Ed.), The Role of the Father in Child Development (pp. 58–93). John Wiley & Sons. https://books.google.com/books?id=dLpOkMwsu-QC
25. Pratiwi, M. R., Yusriana, A., & Poernomo, M. (2024). Phenomenological Study of Fatherlessness in the Lives of Daughters. JURNAL ILMU SOSIAL, 23(1), 130–156. https://doi.org/10.14710/jis.23.1.2024.130-156
26. Rahayu, A. S. (2017). Kehidupan sosial ekonomi single mother dalam ranah domestik dan publik. Jurnal Analisa Sosiologi, 6(1). https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/jas/article/view/18142
27. Tustin, F., & Rhode, M. (2021). Autistic states in children. Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781003090366/autistic-states-children-frances-tustin-maria-rhode
28. UNICEF Indonesia. (2020). The Four Principles of the Convention on the Rights of the Child. UNICEF. https://www.unicef.org/indonesia/child-rights
29. Vani, G. C., Raharjo, S. T., Hidayat, E. N., & Humaedi, S. (2014). Pengasuhan (good parenting) bagi anak dengan disabilitas. Share: Social Work Journal, 4(2). https://jurnal.unpad.ac.id/share/article/view/13067
30. Wahyuni, A., Siregar, S. D., & Wahyuningsih, R. (2021). PERAN AYAH (FATHERING) DALAM PENGASUHAN ANAK USIA DINI. AL IHSAN: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Anak Usia Dini, 2(2), 055–066. https://ejournal.iaiibrahimy.ac.id/index.php/alihsan/article/view/726
31. Wen, M., & Lin, D. (2012). Child Development in Rural China: Children Left Behind by Their Migrant Parents and Children of Nonmigrant Families. Child Development, 83(1), 120–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01698.x
32. Willis, R. J. (2000). The Economics of Fatherhood. American Economic Review, 90(2), 378–382. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.2.378
33. Yogman, M., Garfield, C. F., Bauer, N. S., Gambon, T. B., Lavin, A., Lemmon, K. M., Mattson, G., Rafferty, J. R., Wissow, L. S., Child, C. on P. A. of, & Health, F. (2016). Fathers’ roles in the care and development of their children: The role of pediatricians. Pediatrics, 138(1). https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article-abstract/138/1/e20161128/52467
34. Yunianti, E., & Mulya, T. W. (2023). The Traditional to egalitarian | International Conference on Indigenous Psychology and Culture. https://seminar.ustjogja.ac.id/index.php/icipc/article/view/689

License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 Evi Muafiah, Anis Afifah, Lutfiana Dwi Mayasari, Ahmad Mujib

Indexing & Citations